Peer Review Policy

Single-anonymous peer review process used by JCF.

All manuscripts submitted to JCF undergo a single-anonymous peer review process.

  1. Paper Submission — The corresponding or submitting author uploads the manuscript via the journal's online submission system.
  2. Initial Editorial Check — The Editorial Office verifies compliance with the Author Guidelines, including formatting and plagiarism policy. Non-compliant papers are returned for revision.
  3. Editor-in-Chief — The EIC evaluates the manuscript for scope, originality, and merit, and may reject it at this stage.
  4. Assignment to Handling Editor — Suitable manuscripts are assigned to a Handling Editor and sent to at least two independent expert reviewers.
  5. Peer Review — Reviewers independently assess the manuscript and recommend accept, revise, or reject.
  6. Editorial Decision — The Handling Editor evaluates all reviews and decides. Possible outcomes: accept without revision, accept with revision, or reject.
  7. Decision Notification — Authors receive the decision with anonymized reviewer comments.
  8. Final Step — Accepted papers proceed to production; revised manuscripts may be re-reviewed as needed.

JCF adheres to the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines. Decisions are based on importance, originality, clarity, validity, and relevance to the journal scope.